Wave, Digital Library, Semantic Web
I played around with Google Wave a bit. I didn’t get it first, but after a while I saw its charms, well, potential charms. We finally seem to have a non clumsy tool to collaborate and communicate, the latter perhaps more than the former.
It may help to streamline thoughts on how to proceed if we want our (digital) libraries to become part of the semantic web. I started a wave therefore, and posted the following message.
——
Working from the assumption that the library should become part of the semantic web, what should we do? Is the following a reasonable set of things to do?
1) Identify what we have, and give it a URI (meaning that authors, documents (objects), keywords, and concepts should get a URI
2) deposit the URI’s in a registry, with a minimal set of triples (relate URI of documents to URI of authors, etc…): what is the minimal set?
1 and 2 are data level requirements, the following are service level
3) use OAI-ORE to define compound objects
4) define owl:sameAs relations between URI’s when needed (what is the workflow here?)
5) Which vocabularies/ontologies can/should be used for which services. Do we need a service catalogue first?
what else?
——
Now, if you are interested in active participation, let me know
- Web Designer
- Website Development for Bolder Giving
- Stop policypitch.com web2.0 wiki in Southern Baptist China.
December 14th, 2009 at 1:21 am
[...] Dit blogartikel was vermeld op Twitter door Lukas Koster, Henk Ellermann. Henk Ellermann heeft gezegd: -=( In Between )=-: Wave, Digital Library, Semantic Web http://bit.ly/6In1kh [...]
December 14th, 2009 at 5:55 pm
Semantic web – The world government global database.
http://kencraggs.livejournal.com/
December 30th, 2009 at 5:07 pm
Social comments and analytics for this post…
This post was mentioned on Twitter by ellermann: -=( In Between )=-: Wave, Digital Library, Semantic Web http://bit.ly/6In1kh...